KURDS AND UIGHURS ON THE US-ISRAELI CHESSBOARD.

FROM THE VENEZUELIAN WEEKLY

KIKIRIKI

KURDS AND UIGHURS ON THE US-ISRAELI CHESSBOARD.

EURASIA AND THE FREE WORLD IN DANGER.

In our recent report and analysis of the events that are shaking Syria and Libya, we emphasized various essential elements:

-         on the military side, the opposition groups supported by Washington are getting strengthened with Taliban forces (*) – a detail which could explain the mediatic assassination of Bin Laden (it matters only little whether he is presently on a shore of Miami with his old friend George Bush or already dead for years, what really does, is that his presence does not jeopardize the total and official integration of the Taliban into the US strategic system), the Mediterranean getting changed into Washington’s ‘Mare nostrum’ under control by the men of Bin Laden;

-         the US strategic system aims at the stealing of the oil reserves of Libya, Iraq, Algeria, etc… as well as the securing those of water for Israel’s benefit, most of all at the encirclement and isolation of both Iran y China while threatening Russia;

-         the isolation of Latin America and the Caribbean area, especially Venezuela and Cuba, from their allies in Eurasia, in order to steal their natural resources and to submit their peoples back into their former statute of  ‘Banana Republics’;

-         This Project is none of a ‘Pax Americana’ which could be attractive to cowards: let us live in indignity if this Price for peace! – But of a general destabilization of the kind Iraqis and Afghans are experiencing restless for some twenty years.

We concluded with emphasizing the necessity of shaping the Eurasian entity based on it four essential components: Iran, Russia, China and Turkey. The changes which affect the later however remain problematic. Last year’s aggression against the ‘Liberty Fleet’ and the murder of Turkish peace militants by the Israeli Navy gave the government in Ankara the opportunity to satisfy the popular desire of severing the links with the Zionist State, therefore turning closer to the countries opposing resistance to the US world domination.  Turkey and USA already experienced frictions, especially when in 2003 Turkish troops entered Iraqi Kurdistan, too shortly we then lamented!  This was yet as a consequence of the twelve years of destabilization by Kurds who had been promised by CIA and Mossad, in 1991, full independence and reunification of the Iraqi, Iranian, Syrian and Turkish parts of Kurdistan.

Mere Yankee lie, then unexpectedly Saddam Hussein went on ruling Iraq until 2003, for twelve years taking revenge on Iraqi Kurds and Shiias. Meanwhile, the Kurdish uprising was kept insufficient or limited in order not to achieve its goals against Iraq, however able to destabilize Turkey. Therefore, Turkey and for instance Great Britain found themselves in the same situation: be ‘pillars of NATO’ while getting destabilized on their own territory by separatist terrorist groups supported by Washington: the IRA and the Kurds. Since British military operations in Ulster mainly consist in urban peace-keeping, those of Turkey in Kurdistan take place in the open country, on large operational theatres, with the use of heavy equipment such as tanks, helicopters, aircraft, artillery, etc… in support of the  deployment of the infantry.  It is therefore an expensive war which affects national economy while destabilizing the country.

Simultaneously, the other great power in Asia, China, suffers from a similar process of separatist destabilization inside her provinces of Tibet and Xinkiang, besides her problem with Taiwan. It is publicly known that Taiwan is nothing but a US protectorate, that the Dalai Lama receives US support and benefits of a world mediatic campaign.  The problem of Xinkiang is a part of the destabilization process of Central Asia, extended to North Africa and Europe as it has been shown with the terrorist mass murders in Madrid, Paris, London and Moscow,, today with the attacks to Syria, with the use of the Taliban.

We could therefore establish a comparison between Turkey and China, in as much as both countries suffer a same phenomenon; however on different ways, considering that China managed to reestablish peace on her territory, even if in a mere provisory manner, well keeping in mind that those who manipulate the separatists will not give up so easily; whereas it is obviously not the case of Turkey.  Another, at least formal difference, is that the separatism which affects China has been engendered by a world power which, at least, presents herself as competitive, while in Turkey’s case, as well as in Great-Britain’s and Spain’s, the source of separatist terrorist threat is a NATO ally.

Another essential difference: while China is totally foreign to Kurdish separatism, at least a consistent portion of Turkey’s public and governmental opinion is supporting the separatism in Xinkiang, with the pretext that the inhabitants of that Muslim province of China are Turks by blood and culture. As a matter of fact, the formulation of that Turkish demand on Xinkiang is rather recent for resulting from the process of destabilization started by the Taliban.

   CASE 1: USA-ISRAEL AND KURDISTAN

As a matter of fact, there is another common element which links both attempts of destabilization, an element which deserves to be underlined in proportion to the will to keep it hidden: the active presence of Israel. Iraqi Kurdistan, which is the source of the process of destabilization of the entire region, enjoys autonomy under the presidency of Masood Barzani. With Israel’s support, he shows himself as the chief of independent State.  Thus, in May 2010, Barzani addressed the government of Iraq in order to negotiate the incomes of the Kurd Oilfields.  In the Kurd capital city, Erbil, the Iraqi national flag has been banned while several western countries have inaugurated a consulate there.

In matters of Defense, Masood Barzani, who already dispose of his own ‘special services‘, is presently busy on the project of a « regional » Kurd Army.  The word « regional » means that this army should be able to recrut and operate in all areas with a Kurdish population, not only in Iraq but in Turkey, Iran and Syria as well.  Therefore, an instrument of « regional destabilization ».  That is why Masood Barzani had to submit his project to general Dany Yatom, retired director of the Mossad, at the first place; then in January 2010 to Barack Obama; leaving the task of achieving the fusion of the peshmergas militias to the Israeli private company Camerone Military Services, according to the confidential newspaper Intelligence on line.

Support to Israel by the Barzani tribe is an historical fact which goes back to the late 1930s, when Ruben Shilia, working for the Jewish Agency, visited  Kurdistan and was their guest. Some Jewish members of the tribe had already emigrated to Palestine.  Shilia belonged, alike David Ben Gurion, to the fathers of the Zionist State as well as of the « peripherical allies theory » which Oded Yinon reinvented in 1982 in the magazine of the World Zionist Organization, which advocates the partition of Arab countries into ethnic and religious groups.  After the fall of the anglophile monarchy in 1958, the Mossad took over the role of the KGB which had ordered Mustafa Barzani lay down the arms and desactivate the Kurd brigade which had been formed in Tachkent. The Mossad consolidated its presence during the Aref Brothers’ presidency of Iraq, from 1963 to 1968.

In this period, a local agent of the Mossad named Eliezer Tsafrir was in charge of the formation of the Peshmerga Milicias as well as of Masood Barzani’s PDK’s secret services, the Parastin.  Mustafa Barzani went to Tel-Aviv in 1968 and 1973, meeting Golda Meir and Moshe Dayan.  In 1980, Menahem Begin admitted that Israel was supplying the Kurd rebels with weapons and therefore supporting the creation of the Kurdish State.

After the occupation of Iraq in 2003, dozens of Mossad agents entered Kurdistan disguised as all sorts of technical experts. The operation was led by Dany Yatom and Shlomi Michaels and its size was revealed in 2004 by the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot.  Shlomi Michaels had associated with members of the Barzani tribe within the Kudo Company which was in charge of the building of the Erbil Airport and of the instruction of commandos. This information were then denied by Prime Minister Iyad Allaoui, however confirmed in 2006 by BBC2, in a report showing the Mossad agents at work.

Jalal Talabani’s father-in-law, Ibrahim Ahmed, who lived in London under MI6 protection, assured the connection with Israel. It is well documented that Jalal Talabani had a meeting in 1978 with Shimon Peres in the Israeli Embassy in Paris; later in 2008 with Ehud Barak in Greece at a congress of the Socialist International. (Laurent Gbagbo had been induced to the Zionist Alliance in the same circumstances – see our article on the Ivory Coast in the Venezuelan Weekly ‘Kikiriki’ N° 346).

Binyirfan Barzani, one of Masood’s five sons, and Qutab Talabani are presently in charge of the relationship between Kurdistan and Israel; the former in the name of the PDK, the later of the UPK.  Furthermore, Qutab Talabani has been the delegate of the Regional Kurdish Government in the USA where he married Sherri Kraham, the daughter of a member of the AIPEC, the Israeli lobby.

CASE 2: USA-ISRAEL AND XINKIANG

CASE 2:  USA-ISRAEL AND XINKIANG

The question of Turkish support to Xinkiang separatism also has a supranational dimension, extending to all Central Asia.  According to our analysis, the problems of Chechnya and Kashmir gave the Taliban the opportunity to operate outside the Afghan conflict. Yet the supranational dimension of Turkish support to Xinkiang separatism results from the fact that the borders of today’s Turkey do not include all the populations of Turkish blood and culture which spread all over Central Asia, as far as within Chinese territory, as far as Xinkiang.

This operation of destabilization has an instrument: Hodyaefendi (Maestro Sufi) Fethullah GÜLEN’s Fethullahist Sect.  GÜLEN was a mosque preacher on the path of Sayed Nursi, and this until 1998, when he established himself in Pennsylvania. From his large estate, with a hundred of disciples as guests, he manages his empire which stretches over all Turkish speaking Asia and includes a network of schools and universities, of written press and radio and television broadcasting, supported by a financial reserve of 25 billion USD. Officially, the sect claims to have roots in the tradition of the Turkish Sufi Orders, in the heritage of famous Turkish Masters of the past, such as Jalal ad-Din Rumi and Yunus Emre, as well as in the teaching of Sayed Nursi whose disciples have stretched all over the World; offering the image of tolerance and high intellectualism which are proper to Sufism. In reality, the Fethullahists constitute a very powerful lobby within Turkish politics, more precisely the occult backbone of the Party for Justice and Development (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) which has now been ruling for eight years, its schools acting as formation centers of political, administrative and military leaders.

How did a modest preacher achieved to become the manager of such a colossal empire of both public and occult features?

Precisely the occult feature provides with the explanation.  The ideology of both AKP and Fethullahists identifies with National-islamism and its  implications in World politics: the opposition to Zionism and its US protector, the resulting sympathy to Palestinian revolutionary movements, to Iran and to world powers who, for the least, provide a balance to US hegemony: the ALBA, Russia and China.  

Therefore, the presence of GÜLEN in the USA and that in his own spheres of men such as Marc Grossman and Morton Abramowitz, former US ambassadors in Ankara. Is hard to understand. Another important character in the game is Graham Fuller, a former CIA vice-chairman. A book of him about Xinkiang was published in 1998, revised in 2003 by the Rand Corporation.

Abramowitz and Fuller set up in September 2004 in Washington an «exile government of Turkestan », officially with Enver Yusuf Turani, a friend of Gülen, as a chairman.  Which could be the interests of Grossman, Abramowitz and Fuller in promoting in Central Asia a project of rebirth of the Great Islamic Ottoman Empire?  None, except the creation of a new element in the chain de destabilization which includes Kashmir, Chechnya, Afghanistán, Iraq, as well as Syria and North Africa where this chain merges with another one: that of the Atlantic seafront which stretches from Northern Ireland down to West Africa.

Yet in this case, the target is China – the great power in which all freedom loving nations recognize a source of hope, security and admiration – with the fallacious pretext that Chinese Muslims would be suffering discrimination and attempts of deculturation; according to US-based Rabiya Kadear, the chairwoman of the World Wigur Congress, and Mehmet Emin Batur, director of the ETIC (Information Centre of Eastern Turkestan).

The aim of the whole project is therefore the collapse of the great eurasian project which, without being a direct threat to US interests, however constitutes a defense of the free world against its imperialism and its sub-product, Zionism; a project which articulates on its both essential components: Islam in its Turkish and Iranian manifestations, China whose Muslim populations should play a role of a factor of union, not of discord.

OUR  ANALYSIS

In Ankara as in Kabul and in many other places, we witness a rather strange phenomenon: that of people of the CIA and Mossad promoted leaders of the Islamic Revolution!  Yet, we cannot believe that many Muslims will fall into such an obvious trap!  Enough of them however for feeding the USZ-Zionist plot which, for the time being, affects Turkey before China, considering that the government in Ankara is since 1991 the target of the blackmail attempt of destabilization by the Kurds.  An interesting detail which links both theatres, is the fact that in February 2008 some Fethullahists – one of them, a police officer, was in charge of the department of communications taping, according to the newspapers Vatan and Hürriyet (2/6/2008) – achieved to tape and put on the internet a conversation by general Münir Erten in which, besides details concerning general Ergin Sagan’s health, he mentioned the planning of a military operation by Turkish forces inside Iraqi Kurdistan.

Yet in this middle of may 2011, the situation in Kurdistan is worsening as a result of a call to violence by Abdullah Öcalan, the leader of the PKK, from his prison cell on the 29 of April.  Despite the call to peace and patriotic union by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, chief of State, huge demonstrations swept through the country, sometimes violent like in Diyarbakir on the 15^th of may. On that same day, Turkish forces ambushed and killed a dozen of members of the PKK who had been crossing the border from Iraq.

Therefore, an increase of violence seems to be on the agenda, resulting in an increase of pressure on Ankara by the Kurds and Barzani’s US-Israeli friends, in order to blackmail the Turkish government into accepting the plan designed by Gülen’s US-Israeli friends, of destabilization of China.

Let us take as positive the facts that commercial exchanges between Turkey and China will triplate until 2015, that Dr. Hiddayet Nurani Ekrem, an influent member of Türksam, the Centre of Strategic Analysis (Stratejik Analizler Merkezi) directed by Sinan OĞAN and near the Armed Forces, joins our consideration of Turkestan being a bridge of peace and friendship between both countries.   We hope that enough Turkish historians will remember that they were not Chinese, those who in 1917 signed the Balfour Agreement, plotting the crumbling of the Ottoman Empire and the rape and murder of Palestine; but the ancestors of the so-called Grossman, Abramowitz, Yatom, Kraham, etc..  At the same time however, Germans and French were mass killing each other in a fratricide war for the possession of provinces which the later called ‘Alsace-Lorraine’, the first ‘Elsass-Lothringen’, and this while US president Wilson was already planning WWII and the final eradication and submission, the common defeat of all Europeans.  Considering this example, one can forecast that if Turkish patriots and Muslims get led by the nose by their US-Zionist ill-advisors into such hostilities with China, this will not bring ‘Great Turkey’s rebirth’ but the sinking of all Eurasia in a hurricane of blood and flames, while the US-Empire and its Zionist sub-product will have free hands to submit the entire World into the most cruel and implacable tyranny in History. 

 (*)  The air-bridge which allowed the transfer of thousands of Taliban from Iraq to Syria and Libya has a historical precedent:  the evacuation of 8.000 Taliban from the afghan city of Kunduz in November 2001 – just two months after the famous ‘9.11’ – by the CIA with the help of the Pakistani Air Force.  Various high rank officers of the ‘US Forces’ vainly protested, thus showing their ingenuity and poor understanding of the double strategy led from Washington and Langley, the first victims of which are the ‘Boys n’ Gals’ in US uniforms, betrayed by their own administration, CIA and the rest!

SHORT NEWS

Feb. 15. 2011 / Hillary Rodham Clinton sent Marc Grossman as a special envoy of the US government to Islamabad and Kabul, in replacement of defunct Richard C. Holbrooke. 

End of march 2011 / Visit to Islamabad of Prince Bandar from Saudi Arabia, in order to sign a pact of mutual security, as a consequence of the deteriorating relationship between the Kingdom and the USA.

April 12. 2011 /  Security forces intercept in the desert of the Republic of Niger a group of people carrying 640 kg. explosives, including Semtex, and 435 detonators, the whole freight coming Libyan military dumps which had been taken by the ‘protégés’ of  NATO.

April 29.2011 / Fromjail, Abdullah Öcalan, chief of the PKK, called to insurrection.  Despite chief of State Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s call to peace and patriotic union, thousands of people gathered in demonstrations in various cities in Turkey, turning to be violent on May 15th at Diyarbakir.  On the same day, Turkish forces killed in ambush a dozen of members of the PKK who had crossed the border with Iraq.

May  14. 2011 / The National Assembly of Pakistan demands the end of the firing of missiles by US forces in the ‘frontier’ region, threatening to close the Khyber-pass which is crossed by 65% of the logistics of NATO into Afghanistan.

May 19. 2011 /  The Chinese  Minister for Foreign Affairs, Jiang Yu, expressed in a press conference the determination of his country to secure ‘the sovereignty and integrity of the territory of Pakistan’.

May  20. 2011  /  At the Russian harbor of Novorossirsk, security forces arrested a group of Israelis and Russians living in the Republic of Equator, amongst the latter a wanted terrorist from Chechnya.  The group was in possession of 30 kg cocaine, of weapons and sophisticated electronic and communication equipment as produced by Israel and used by Mossad.

June 2nd.2011 / In Jerusalem, Bernard-Henri Lévy gave Benyamin Netanyahu a message from the HQ of the Libyan rebels, stating that the ‘new’ libyan government would maintain « normal des relationship with Israel ». A Ukrainian intelligence officer handled the Libyan government the copy of a letter stating that the ‘new’ Libyan government would allow the building of an Israeli military base in the Djebel Akhdar, in order to threaten Algeria. The Russian Intelligence Services recently published a letter to president Sarkozy from the CNT (Committee of Libyan Rebels), promising 35% of the Libyan oil production in exchange of French military support.

Ahmadinejad joins China, Russia leaders at summit

Kazakstán President Nursultan Nazarbayev (left) welcomes Ahmadinejad (AFP, Stanislav Filippov)

By Aleks Tapinsh (AFP) – 3 hours ago

ASTANA — Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday joined the Chinese and Russian leaders in a rare encounter at a summit in Kazakhstan, where he launched a new attack on the “slavers and colonisers” of the West.

Host Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev urged the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), a security group regarded as a NATO rival founded in 2001, to take a more active role in ensuring regional security.

But most attention was focused on Ahmadinejad, who was absent from last year’s SCO meeting in Tashkent after the UN Security Council agreed sanctions against Iran and was making a rare appearance at a big international meeting.

In a characteristically firebrand speech peppered with rhetorical questions, he launched a new call for a wholesale shake-up of the world order, which he said was “managed and run by slavers and colonizers of the past.”

“I believe together we can reform the way the world is managed. We can restore the tranquillity of the world,” he said.

Turning to his audience of ex-Soviet and Asian leaders he asked: “Have any of us used an atomic bomb against the defenceless citizens of any other country?”

Returning to his past claims that a conspiracy could have been behind the September 11 attacks on the United States, Ahmadinejad added:

“Have any of our countries played a part in the creation of 9/11 under whose pretext Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded and more than one million people have been killed or wounded?”

Chinese leader Hu Jintao held talks on Tuesday with Ahmadinejad, discussing Tehran’s controversial nuclear programme.

China urged Iran to participate in the six-party talks on nuclear energy and “take substantial steps in respect of establishing trust” and “speed up the process of dialogue,” the Chinese state news agency Xinhua reported.

Tehran used to rely on Moscow as a dependable ally in its standoff over the nuclear programme but relations have rapidly deteriorated as Russia increased pressure on Iran after Dmitry Medvedev became president.

Medvedev and Nazarbayev were later to have a trilateral meeting with Ahmadinejad on the sidelines of the summit; a Kazakh diplomatic source who asked not to be named told AFP.

On the unrest shaking the Arab world, the member states agreed a declaration expressing concern about the instability but supporting “the drive of regional states in the path of democratic development in accordance with their specific cultural and historical characteristics.”

Nazarbayev said in his opening address that the organisation had to become a greater force after it showed little capacity to react during last year’s uprising and ethnic violence in member state Kyrgyzstan.

“We watched over two sharp political conflicts and a coup in neighbouring Kyrgyzstan and our organisation did not and could not make any decisions,” he said.

With Afghan President Hamid Karzai attending as a guest, Nazarbayev also expressed alarm that drug trafficking in Afghanistan had increased by a factor of ten in the last decade.

“It is clear that the source and reasons of this crime against humanity are far outside the borders of Afghanistan,” the Kazakh leader said.

The six-member SCO was set up in 2001 as a security counterweight to NATO that would allow Russia and China to rival US influence in Asia. It is now also looking to cooperate at an economic level.

Its membership includes the ex-Soviet Central Asian states and with the likes of India, Iran, Mongolia and Pakistan attending meetings as observers, its summits bring together an eclectic gathering of world leaders.

The summit is the latest in a string of big international meetings hosted by Astana, Kazakhstan’s shiny new capital, which in the last months has already welcomed a summit of the OSCE and the annual meeting of the EBRD.

Kazakhstan has embarked on a tireless campaign of self-promotion to show itself as Central Asia’s most stable and prosperous state although rights activists complain the country shows little tolerance for any dissent.

ANALYSIS BY CBDAE

Whether real or ficticious, whether the supposed brain of international terrorism really fell on that fateful day under the Naval Seals’ gunfire or, after having had a good shave and after changing his name into Monte Christo, he is just right now having a drink with his old mate G. W. Bush; Bin Laden´s assassination was perceived as a well deserved vindication as well as a liberation from the daily threat of terrorism.  However, this was merely a new masterpiece of US deception and mind manipulation: quite on the opposite, the first of May 2011 opened a new era of violence and increased terrorist threat.

It is no coincidence that Bin Laden’s mediatic liquidation came at the same time as the crisis in Libya and Syria, and this for obvious reasons. A tactical: the necessity of transferring thousands of Taliban to Syria and Libya in ground support to the opposition´s rabble.  A strategic: the integration of the Taliban into the US strategic deployment worldwide.  A political: the decision to bring the Taliban back to power in Kabul. A triple project which could not be achieved as long as the man linked to the Twin Towers would still be their boss. The recent news of G. W. Bush´s disgrace at the hand of Human Rights Watch only tends to confirm his protégé´s physical liquidation. The other news, that Bin Laden was using a mobile phone, is a sufficient proof that the CIA could monitor every word he said and every move he made, from their Menwith Hill Base in the UK. Therefore, they perfectly knew where he was, with or without the help of Pakistan.

That the so called ´Moslem Brotherhood´ and the Taliban build the real military ground force of the anti-Kadhafi and anti-Asad, NATO supported opposition, is no secret. More interesting although less documented, is the fact that the aggression against Libya and Syria, far from being a justified popular uprising against two dictators, gives the US strategists the opportunity to destabilise the entire region, just as they have done with Central Asia from Afghanistan, with Turkey and, vainly, with Iran from Iraq. The capture in April in the desert of Niger, of a group of terrorists carrying 640 kg explosives including SEMTEX, coincides with a new wave of terrorist attacks in Algeria, with the activation of the Boko Haram terrorist sect in Nigeria. The fact that this freight of SEMTEX was going westwards, and not towards the Middle or Far-East, confirms the reactivation of the destabilisation process of the Atlantic area, whether the chain of crisis which stretches from Belfast to Abidjan or, making waves across the sea, the countries of the Caribbean Sea and Latin America.

A short glance at the geopolitical scenery indicates the intersection at the level of Morocco and the Mediterranean of two axis of destabilisation. That which runs along the Eurafrican Atlantic coast, that which starts from there and runs up to China, uniting the heartlands of Eurafrica and Eurasia, practically the Mediterranean region to Afghanistan. The Madrid and London bombings of 2004 and 2005 were clear signals to the ETA and IRA: your era ended with the new version of terrorism, that of the pseudo-islamists. A significant fact is the odyssey of two ETA members, Gorka Vidal Alvaro and Izkus Badillo. Both had failed to understand that the time of Basque and Irish terrorism had dropped from the CIA agenda. Obviously they resented this as an offence and tried at least a last-ditch struggle with planting a bomb in Spain, maybe the last one in the history of the ETA, with the message: we are still there! On that 16 April 2005, coming originally from France, they were driving two different cars on the motorway between Cuenca and Madrid, at a few miles distance, the second car carrying 536 kg explosives. Suddenly, the first car had an accident: the wounded driver Izkus Badillo called the guy behind on his mobile phone, and red went the light at Menwith Hill CIA HQ!  They called the Spanish police and both men ended the day in jail.

Why is this story so heavily significant?  Because it shows that no terrorist action, large or small, can be performed without the green light from the CIA. Both morons had ignored the change in Langley´s strategy and that the time of the ETA was over. Thus they had decided to make their own scenario, without telling anyone, without waiting for the approval from ‘over there´. This is however the evidence that those who run the Echelon System are able to detect and localise on the spot any of the actors of international terrorism, big or small, whether they speak Basque, Urdu, Gaelic or Swahili. So, they were able to immediately detect the voices and localise the physical presence of these two NCOs of the Gudariak but not of Bin Laden?  At a time when Hilary Clinton points her pretty finger at Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and  Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani for their alleged support to terrorism, these three gentlemen´s answer should be short and simple: Your people, dear Lady, not mine, manage your Echelon System!     

No doubt, there will be plenty of careers available to those ready to move to the Menwith Hill area in the UK. Plenty of bottles of Johnny Walker to get from the boys of the MI5 every time they need a quick phone taping and have to jump over the legal barriers. Plenty of times the red light blushing when things are poised to happen from Mumbay to Lagos, from Tamanrasset to Kandahar, certainly soon again from the banks of the Seine to those of the Nile, according to the caprices of general Petraeus´ new employees. The US strategy of the 60s to the 80s was ‘Send the Marines!’ Today it says: ‘Bring the terrorists in!’.

General Petraeus´ promotion to Langley while Leon Panetta is moving to the Pentagon is however less significant as Marc Grossman´s new job in Kabul and Islamabad as a re-enactor of Harry Kissinger´s famous ´bulldozing´. The assassination of Hamid Kerzai´s brother seems to indicate who will be the next on the list, especially on the day of the Taliban´s victory parade on the streets of Kabul. Will Hamid Kerzai and his bunch of morons from the afghan bourgeoisie, share the fate of Najibullah in 1996?  It is indeed on the US agenda that the power in Kabul will be handled over to the Taliban with all the needed permissions and encouragements to destabilise Russia, China, Pakistan, Iran, India and as far as Korea and the Philippines if necessary. All this comes true as commandos of Al Qaeda just got arrested in Turkey and Iran, as Taliban keep submitting the ´frontier´ stripe between Pakistan and Afghanistan to their own rule. Marc Grossman is certainly the right man at the right place, knowing that his real interest goes much further than just walking on the footsteps of his named model, rather stretching his legs from Xinkiang to Kurdistan. As a former US ambassador in Ankara, he is very much concerned with using Turkish nostalgia of the great Ottoman Empire as a spear pointed at the heart of China, his real enemy. The same applies to Morton Abramowitz, a man of a similar profile, equally active in supporting the sect of Fethullah Gülen. One can therefore expect new troubles to come in the Chinese Xinkiang area.

Other men of a similar profile but on another front: those of the CIA and Mossad who are busy with manipulating the Kurds against Turkey. Thus, while some agents of the Mossad and CIA keep provoking the Kurds into attacking Turkey, other agents of the Mossad and CIA feed the nostalgia of Turkey´s passed imperial splendour, with the prospect of using it as fuel for setting on fire the Moslem provinces of China.

China´s military reforms, in particular the development of the People’s Liberation Army’s Second Artillery Force, of the Navy´s submarines, aircraft carriers and amphibious forces, offer an optimistic perspective to the people of the World who resent the

Unipolar, global tyranny of the US Empire. The guarantee by the Chinese of the integrity of Pakistan´s strategic liberty and territorial integrity constitutes the diplomatic and geopolitical counterpart to the military reforms and achievements planned in Beijing. This should be an open message to the diplomacy makers in India: you have nothing to win by playing the role of the Lackeys of the US and Zionist strategy in Asia. The problems with Pakistan should be solved on a peaceful and friendly way, without allowing the common enemy of all peoples of Asia, of all peoples in the World, to apply the famous principle: Divide to reign... even if, like in Mumbay, agents of destabilisation do their dirty job. 

Meanwhile, the people of Syria and Libya have shown the World their loyalty to their governments. Our comrade Rafael Malpica, a faithful militant of the PSUV (United Socialist Party of Venezuela), said on a radio broadcasting on the World Day of the Child, that the bombings and planned children killings by the USAF and its local, NATO Lackeys, that the neo-colonialist policy of France in Africa, were making of that very day a Day of Infamy. Only a few days before, the death of six French soldiers in Afghanistan made of the French Bastille Day another Day of Infamy. French general Desportes was criticized by the hierarchy for expressing what every French soldier and officer, what every French citizen thinks and feels in the deepest of his heart: no drop of French blood for the Yanks!

Nicolas Sarkozy´s fanaticism in serving US and Zionist interests in Libya finds an explanation in the fact that only a couple of months ago, the French president betrayed the interests he is truly supposed to serve, those of Israel and the USA, when supporting his friend Ouattara against Laurent Gbagbo, the favourite of Israel, in the conflict ravaging the Republic of the Ivory Coast. By doing so, he served his own financial interests, those of his friends of the Parisian bourgeoisie against those of the Mafia. Kennedy was shot dead for the same error, for having betrayed the trust of Mayer-Lansky and general Lemnitzer when stopping the Northwood ´false flag operation’ against Cuba.

This takes us back to the Caribbean and to the northern coast of Latin America. The two axis of US destabilisation we have mentioned have as an effect the isolation of this part of the World from its natural allies in Eurafrica and Eurasia. There is only little doubt, that the US strategists will not wait very long, should countries in Africa and Asia be facing their own destabilisation problems, before aggressing Cuba, Venezuela and the countries of Latin America who refuse to be sent back to their passed status of Banana Republics. 

The killing in Benghazi of the boss of the French company SECOPEX, the strong presence of foreigners, especially Latinos, amongst the US Forces, recalls of the question of the mercenaries, tightly linked to the ‘false flag’ concept so much in fashion in Langley. It is reasonable to think that the Colombians who are a majority within the Battalion Blackwater are parts of projects which do not exclude the ‘Patria Socialista’ de Hugo Chavez.

There is only one way to deter the aggression: show the aggressor that we are ready to fight until the last pulse of heart, that our people will prefer to die in combat than to bow to the yoke of yankee slavery. Yes, we have seen what the Yanks and their Lackeys are up to, in Libya, in Iraq, in Afghanistan... We have been warned. We will not have the excuse of being caught by surprise. Let us develop, train and arm our Bolivarian Militia and make of it a real popular, total resistance army, ready to fight in the forest and in the mountain, to develop a city guerrilla as well as for making of any field a cemetery for the aggressor. Let the Gringos keep in mind:  Venezuela starts with a ´V´... like Vietnam!